Starting Again Without Starting Over

What does your grade mean when you step into someone else’s dojo?

What happens to your grade when you join a different dojo?

Perhaps you have trained for many years. You may hold a black belt, maybe even a senior grade. You earned it legitimately, worked hard for it, and it represents years of training and experience.

Then you walk into another dojo.

The syllabus may be different, the kata unfamiliar, and some of the terminology new to you. Your instructor may teach movements differently, use different drills, or place emphasis on principles that were not part of your previous training.

So what grade are you now?

Over the years, I have had several people come to train with me who already held black belts elsewhere. Some expected to continue wearing them. A few were quite insistent that because they had earned a black belt somewhere else, they should be allowed to wear it in my dojo.

Others arrived wearing a white belt without being asked.

Someone can put on a white belt without denying everything they have previously achieved. The white belt simply says, “I am beginning here”.

Their experience hasn’t disappeared. The movement, coordination, timing and understanding developed through years of training are still there. An experienced practitioner may learn much more quickly than someone who has never trained before, and may recognize familiar principles beneath unfamiliar movements almost immediately.

That does not make them a beginner in martial arts.

But they may well be a beginner in that particular system.

I think that distinction is important because grades are not universal qualifications. A grade represents achievement within a particular dojo, style, organization or relationship between teacher and student. It tells us that someone, somewhere, considered that person to have reached a particular standard.

But the standard may not be the same somewhere else.

Even within the same style, two dojo can have quite different expectations for the same grade. Change styles completely and the differences can become much greater.

That does not make the previous grade meaningless. It simply gives it context.

The same question can arise when someone returns after being away from training for many years. The grade may have been genuinely earned, but time away can change what the person is currently able to demonstrate. Again, that does not erase what they achieved before, but it may mean that the belt no longer tells the whole story.

If someone joins my dojo with years of previous experience, I would not treat them as though that experience never happened. Their ability will become apparent very quickly. Previous experience deserves to be recognized for what it is.

But if they do not know my syllabus, my kata, my drills or the standards I associate with a particular grade, I don’t think the belt they earned somewhere else automatically tells me what grade they should hold here.

If they stand beside one of my students wearing the same belt, that belt suggests a certain equivalence. It suggests that both people have met the requirements represented by that grade.

If one of them has never even seen those requirements, the belt begins to say something that isn’t yet true.

For me, there is also a responsibility to the students already training in the dojo. They have worked through the syllabus, met the standards required of them, and earned the grade they wear. Simply telling a newcomer to “wear whatever belt you like” may sound relaxed and welcoming, but I am not sure it is fair to those students.

If a grade is meant to represent something, then I think the instructor has a responsibility to protect what it represents.

There is also a difference between assuming your previous grade should be recognized and asking the instructor what you should wear. If the instructor tells you to wear your black belt, then wear it. The important thing is that the decision is theirs, not yours.

There are different ways of dealing with this, of course. An instructor might assess an experienced newcomer and place them at an appropriate point within the syllabus. They may take some or all of that person’s previous experience into account. Another instructor may ask them to begin again and progress quickly as they demonstrate what they already know.

I don’t think there has to be one universal answer.

An experienced practitioner wearing a white belt does not suddenly move like a novice. Their experience will show. They do not need a black belt around their waist to convince everyone that they have trained before.

If anything, being comfortable enough to wear white can demonstrate a certain confidence in what they already know.

They have nothing to prove by the color of the belt.

Starting again does not mean starting over.

You do not lose the years you have trained. You do not lose the grade you legitimately earned, the lessons you learned, or the skills you developed along the way.

You are simply acknowledging that you have entered somewhere new.

Receive new Applied Methods articles by email. Unsubscribe at any time.

Help Keep Applied Methods Free

Applied Methods is independently written and freely available. If you enjoy the articles and would like to support the continued writing and upkeep of the site, contributions are always appreciated, but never expected.

1 thought on “Starting Again Without Starting Over”

  1. So, I have a tiny bit of experience here.😁
    Hayashi ha Shito ryu: started again at 10th kyu, same with Goju ryu.
    Seibukan Shorin ryu: told by Sensei Banks to wear my black belt the first night, despite my protestations. We also worked on Machimora Chinto that night. Eek!😄

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top